Responses to Helprin’s Bad Idea
May 22, 2007 · Posted in IP
In an OpEd piece in the NYT, Mark Helprin argues for perpetual copyright. In addition to the two responses If:Book points to (Lessing’s wiki-based collective response and David Rothman’s excellent critique), I want to draw attention to Bob Blechman’s musings on what a retroactive perpetual copyright might mean for him.
I’d like to believe no one would take Helprin seriously, but I’m worried that far too many people will.
Comments
No Responses to “Responses to Helprin’s Bad Idea”
Leave a Reply
Twitter Feed- Visited Arbor Day Farm in Nebraska City yesterday, which is where Arbor Day was started. I should remember to take pictures.
- A good start to what I hope to be a good day.
- Trying to get this week on the right track.
I am worried that far too many people will take me seriously as well.
That would be frightening indeed.
Jonathan Letham had a pretty good argument against intellectual property in a recent issue of Harper’s.
BTW, you should do the “Seven Random Things about Me” meme on my blog website…
Aye, Letham’s piece is great. I discussed it a few months ago.