Projector slide 1]
Lastly, I want to touch on evaluation of MOO-based writing projects.
Evaluation criteria will, of course, depend upon the goals of the
course and of the particular assignment. For major MOO-projects in
a composition class, Im interested in two things: Rhetorical
principles and demonstration of knowledge. Questions I ask include:
Projector slide 2]
Does the MOO project make sense? By that I mean:
does the project get its meaning across in some
do the rooms and their objects relate in some way
to their content/meaning?
can one tell where the project ends and the rest
of the MOO begins?
Projector slide 3]
Does the MOO project demonstrate knowledge?
does the project not only have a message, but is
that message worthwhile (is it the kind of thinking we would expect
from a traditional paper)?
is the information in the MOO project factual, logical,
supported well, and documented?
do the rooms and objects demonstrate an understanding
of the topic?
Projector slide 4]
Does the MOO project demonstrate rhetorical awareness?
is the project navigable?
are there cues to help readers decide what they
might want to look at more closely?
do the rooms have objects which impart information,
or are there empty rooms with nothing but description?
is the project accessible for the intended audience?
Does the audience need to bring special knowledge with them in order
to understand the project?
Digging 1 | Digging
2 | Digging 3 | Digging
4 | Digging 5 | Digging
6 | Digging 7 | Digging
8 | Digging 10